| Historical Information |
|---|
| This post is about a previous Session of Parliament. Any legislation here that did not receive Royal Assent has been terminated. |
C-64 – The Pharmacare Act – sets up a national pharmacare program.
Principles
First up The Pharmacare Act outlines the guiding principles on how the Minister of Health should approach the program. The Minister should:
- Improve access to pharmaceutical products, including through coverage, in a way that’s consistent across Canada
- Improve the affordability of pharmaceutical products
- Support the appropriate use of pharmaceuticals in a way that prioritizes patient health, optimizes health outcomes, and reinforces the sustainability of the healthcare system
- Provide universal coverage of pharmaceuticals
Funding
Under C-64 the government will be committed to providing funding for single-payer pharmaceutical programs provided by provinces, territories, and Indigenous communities. Once a province signs off on an agreement with the feds they’ll be able to get funding to cover the cost of certain prescription drugs, as well as any drugs related to diabetes and contraception. C-64 explicitly calls out that this funding will only be provided for first-dollar coverage. It will pay for the prescriptions and is not for anything else.
Minister’s Powers and Obligations
Once the Pharmacare Act passes the Minister of Health will start working with the Canadian Drug Agency on a few things, starting with a list of drugs that should be covered by the Act. The Agency will have one year to put together a list of essential drugs and related products that should be covered by it.
Once the list has been made the Minister will start working with the provinces to establish their pharmacare programs. The Minister will also work on a bulk purchasing strategy for the drugs on the list.
Next, to maintain and update the pharmacare plan, the Minister will need to consult with the Canadian Drug Agency for information on:
- The clinical and cost effectiveness of prescription drugs compared to other medical treatments
- Updates on the drugs that should be included in the pharmacare plan
- Information and recommendations given to doctors on the appropriate use of prescription drugs
- Improvements to be made to the pharmaceutical system in general
Reports
The Minister will have one year to publish a strategy on the appropriate use of prescription drugs. Every three years after that the Minister will have the Canadian Drug Agency look into the progress on the strategy and provide a report on it.
Finally the Minister will have 30 days after C-64 passes to put together a team of experts to look into the implementation and financing of the Pharmacare Program. This team will have a year to report their recommendations back to the Minister.
Why does C-64 matter?
The Liberals and NDP argue that improving access to prescription drugs will help the overall health of Canadians, and that removing the cost of those drugs will help lower the cost of living for Canadians who rely on these drugs. It’ll also help reduce unplanned pregnancies as there will be more access to contraceptives, and make life more affordable for diabetics.
I don’t see anything from the Conservatives in the House on C-64 yet, but the biggest criticism for it right now is that it relies on provincial participation and two provinces have already said they won’t be getting involved in it. (Alberta and Quebec, though Quebec already has its own pharmacare program)
Progress
Stephen Ellis (Conservative, Nova Scotia, Cumberland—Colchester) wanted to block this Act from proceeding to its Second Reading because:
the bill does nothing to address the health care crisis and will instead offer Canadians an inferior pharmacare plan that covers less, costs more, and builds up a massive new bureaucracy that Canadians can’t afford.
This Motion failed with the Conservatives and Bloc voting in favour of it.
Party For Against Paired Liberal 0 150 1 Conservative 118 0 0 Bloc Quebecois 31 0 1 NDP 0 23 0 Green 0 2 0 Independent 2 1 0 Vote Record
It then went up for its Second Reading vote and passed with the Liberals and NDP voting in support and Conservatives and Bloc voting against.
| Party | For | Against | Paired |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal | 151 | 0 | 1 |
| Conservative | 0 | 115 | 0 |
| Bloc Quebecois | 0 | 31 | 1 |
| NDP | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Independent | 1 | 2 | 0 |
While at committee minor changes were made to C-64, and when it came back Stephen sponsored a series of Motions to remove each section from it, including its short title. All of these Motions were put into a single group to be voted on all at once and were defeated with the same vote split, and the version sent back by committee was accepted with the same split again.
Finally C-64 went up for its Third Reading and again the Conservatives and Bloc opposed it while the Liberals and NDP supported it. It was then sent on to the Senate where it was passed without change, and has now been given Royal Assent.
Discover more from Commons Sense
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.